The race to establish state-level Bitcoin reserves has a clear frontrunner. Texas has officially become the first U.S. state to fund a strategic cryptocurrency reserve, making an initial $5 million purchase of BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF through the state comptroller's office.
The purchase, executed in late November 2025 at a per-share price of $51.87 when Bitcoin was trading near $91,300, marks a watershed moment in the relationship between American state governments and digital assets. While other states have passed enabling legislation, Texas is the first to actually commit public funds to a Bitcoin position.
How Texas Got Here
The groundwork for this historic purchase was laid in June 2025, when Governor Greg Abbott signed Senate Bill 21 into law. The legislation created a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and appropriated $10 million in initial funding—making Texas the third state to sign a Bitcoin reserve bill into law, following New Hampshire and Arizona, but the first to establish a dedicated funding mechanism.
The structure is notable. Rather than simply authorizing purchases, Texas created a separate account (Fund 1018 in the state's fiscal management system) specifically for Bitcoin holdings. This institutional architecture suggests the state views cryptocurrency as a permanent feature of its asset allocation, not a one-time experiment.
"This purchase represents a placeholder investment until the state formally contracts with a cryptocurrency custodian chosen through a request for proposals process."
— Texas Comptroller's Office statement on the initial purchase
The Custody Question
The choice to begin with a spot Bitcoin ETF rather than direct cryptocurrency holdings reflects practical considerations. State officials have expressed a preference for self-custody options—cold storage or multi-signature wallets that would give Texas direct control over its Bitcoin. But establishing the security infrastructure, custody protocols, and regulatory compliance for direct holdings takes time.
The ETF investment allows the state to gain Bitcoin exposure immediately while the custody RFP process proceeds. BlackRock's IBIT, which has attracted over $50 billion in assets since launching in January 2024, offers institutional-grade security and regulatory clarity that makes it an appropriate interim solution.
The next phase for Texas involves selecting a custodian and potentially transitioning from ETF shares to direct Bitcoin ownership. This could position the state as both an investor in and a direct holder of the underlying cryptocurrency—a distinction that matters both for asset control and for the state's influence in the broader Bitcoin ecosystem.
The Competitive Landscape
Texas's move has intensified competition among states considering similar initiatives. At least 28 U.S. states have introduced Bitcoin reserve proposals, though many remain stalled in legislative processes or have been rejected outright.
New Hampshire
New Hampshire passed its Bitcoin reserve legislation in 2025 but has not yet made purchases. The state's smaller budget and more cautious approach have kept it behind Texas in actual implementation.
Arizona
Arizona presents a more complicated picture. Governor Katie Hobbs signed a pared-down Bitcoin and Digital Assets Reserve Fund bill (HB 2749) focused on abandoned digital assets, while vetoing more aggressive proposals that would have allowed investment of public retirement funds in cryptocurrency. The governor cited concerns that "retirement funds are not the place for the state to try untested investments like virtual currency."
This bifurcated approach—accepting crypto from abandoned property while rejecting public fund investment—illustrates the political tensions that cryptocurrency reserves generate even in crypto-friendly states.
Why States Are Interested
The appeal of Bitcoin reserves for state governments extends beyond simple speculation on price appreciation:
- Inflation hedging: With the Federal Reserve's 2% inflation target proving difficult to achieve, states are seeking assets that may preserve purchasing power better than traditional fixed-income holdings.
- Portfolio diversification: Bitcoin's correlation with traditional assets, while increasing, remains lower than correlations between stocks and bonds, potentially offering genuine diversification benefits.
- Technology leadership: States competing for cryptocurrency and blockchain businesses see reserve holdings as a signal of regulatory openness and technological sophistication.
- Fiscal innovation: For states seeking to differentiate themselves in competition for businesses and residents, Bitcoin reserves represent a form of policy innovation that generates national attention.
Risks and Controversies
The Texas purchase has not been without critics. Cryptocurrency's volatility—Bitcoin has experienced multiple drawdowns exceeding 50% in its history—raises questions about whether public funds should bear such risk. The asset's 24/7 trading and global market structure also create governance challenges that traditional public finance hasn't confronted.
There are also philosophical objections. Some fiscal conservatives argue that government has no business speculating in volatile assets, while some cryptocurrency advocates question whether state involvement aligns with Bitcoin's decentralized, anti-institutional origins.
What Comes Next
With Texas breaking the seal on actual purchases, 2026 is likely to see other states accelerate their own initiatives. The practical precedent of a successful purchase—with custody, accounting, and regulatory frameworks now established—removes uncertainty that may have held back other states.
For investors and cryptocurrency enthusiasts, state-level adoption represents a new category of institutional demand. If even a fraction of the 28 states considering reserves ultimately make purchases, the aggregate demand could be significant. Texas's $10 million allocation is modest by state budget standards; a broader movement could represent billions in new institutional buying.
The state Bitcoin reserve experiment is no longer theoretical. Texas has made it real, and the implications for both public finance and cryptocurrency markets are just beginning to unfold.