Strategy Inc., the software company that has become synonymous with corporate Bitcoin accumulation, dodged a major bullet Tuesday when index provider MSCI announced it would not proceed—at least for now—with a proposal to exclude digital asset treasury companies from its widely-tracked Global Investable Market Indexes.

The decision sent Strategy shares surging 6% in after-hours trading as investors exhaled with relief. Analysts had warned that forced exclusion from MSCI indexes could have triggered up to $15 billion in mandatory selling by passive funds that track the benchmarks, potentially crushing the stock and destabilizing the broader crypto market.

The Exclusion Threat

The drama began in October 2025 when MSCI issued a consultation proposal suggesting that companies holding digital assets comprising 50% or more of their total assets should be classified as non-operating investment companies and excluded from its equity indexes. The rationale was that such firms function more like investment funds than traditional operating businesses.

The proposal named 39 companies, including Strategy, Japanese Bitcoin holder Metaplanet, and numerous smaller crypto treasury firms. For Strategy, which holds approximately 450,000 Bitcoin worth over $40 billion at current prices, the stakes were existential. Exclusion from MSCI indexes would have forced index-tracking ETFs and mutual funds to sell their positions regardless of price.

"We are surprised by this clearly positive development. What remains to be seen is whether this represents a victory for the defense or merely a stay of execution."

— Lance Vitanza, TD Cowen analyst

Strategy's Aggressive Defense

Strategy mounted an aggressive campaign against the proposal, arguing that digital asset treasury companies are fundamentally operating businesses rather than investment vehicles. The company published a detailed response on its website making several key arguments:

  • Operating company structure: Strategy generates software revenue and employs hundreds of people in product development and sales
  • Treasury management distinction: Holding Bitcoin as a treasury reserve asset differs fundamentally from running an investment fund
  • Arbitrary threshold: The 50% digital asset cutoff has no precedent in MSCI methodology and discriminates against a specific asset class
  • Market disruption: Forced exclusion would harm passive investors who own the stock through index funds

The lobbying effort extended beyond public statements. Strategy engaged directly with MSCI, providing data and analysis supporting its position. Other affected companies joined the effort, creating an unusually coordinated pushback against an index methodology change.

MSCI's Careful Retreat

In its announcement Tuesday, MSCI stated that "distinguishing between investment companies and those holding digital assets requires further research." The index provider will maintain current treatment for companies with digital assets exceeding 50% of total assets while it continues to study the issue.

The language suggests MSCI isn't abandoning its concerns entirely—merely postponing action while it gathers more information. The consultation remains open, and future rule changes remain possible.

Key elements of MSCI's decision:

  • No immediate exclusion: Affected companies remain in MSCI indexes
  • Continued research: MSCI will further study classification methodology
  • Extended consultation: Stakeholder feedback period continues
  • Future flexibility: No commitment to permanently include digital asset companies

Analyst Reactions Split

Wall Street's reaction to the MSCI decision revealed divergent views on Strategy's prospects. Bulls celebrated the reprieve as validation of the company's investment thesis, while bears cautioned that fundamental concerns about the business model remain unaddressed.

Benchmark analyst Mark Palmer, who maintains a $705 price target on Strategy, called the decision "a welcome reprieve" but added that "MSCI's decision to consider the exclusion of non-operating companies from its indexes means that this episode is not yet over."

The caution reflects an underlying tension in Strategy's investment case. The company's stock has become a leveraged bet on Bitcoin, with its software business almost incidental to the investment thesis. Whether that model merits inclusion in traditional equity indexes is a legitimate question that MSCI may revisit.

Broader Implications for Crypto Treasury Companies

Strategy is far from alone in the digital asset treasury space. A growing number of companies have adopted Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies as treasury reserve assets, following Strategy's pioneering approach. The MSCI decision has implications for the entire category.

Other companies affected by the consultation saw their shares rise in sympathy:

  • Metaplanet: Japanese Bitcoin holder gained 4%
  • Bitmine Immersion (BMNR): Rose 3% in after-hours trading
  • Twenty One Capital (XXI): Bitcoin treasury company advanced 2%

The episode highlights the regulatory and indexing complexities that arise when traditional corporate structures intersect with digital assets. As more companies consider Bitcoin treasury strategies, the questions MSCI raised will likely resurface in various forms.

What Strategy's Rally Means

Strategy shares have been on a wild ride since the company—then called MicroStrategy—first announced Bitcoin purchases in 2020. The stock has served as a proxy for Bitcoin exposure, often trading with higher volatility than the underlying cryptocurrency itself.

The MSCI reprieve removes a near-term risk that had weighed on the shares, but it doesn't resolve fundamental questions about valuation. Strategy trades at a significant premium to its Bitcoin holdings, reflecting investor expectations for continued accumulation and potential upside from software operations.

For investors, the key question is whether Strategy's premium to net asset value is justified. Bulls argue the company's ability to issue equity and debt to acquire more Bitcoin creates a compounding effect. Bears counter that the premium could evaporate if market sentiment shifts or regulatory pressures intensify.

The Road Ahead

Strategy's immediate crisis has passed, but the company operates in an environment of persistent uncertainty. Beyond index inclusion questions, the firm faces:

  • Bitcoin volatility: The company's fortunes remain tied to crypto price movements
  • Regulatory evolution: Crypto accounting rules and tax treatment continue to develop
  • Competition: More companies are entering the Bitcoin treasury space
  • Software business: The legacy analytics business requires ongoing investment

For now, Strategy has won a reprieve that preserves its position in passive investment portfolios. Whether that victory proves durable will depend on both Bitcoin's trajectory and the company's ability to demonstrate that its corporate structure merits traditional equity index treatment.

The MSCI saga serves as a reminder that the intersection of traditional finance and digital assets remains fraught with complexity—and that even apparent victories may prove temporary in this rapidly evolving landscape.